|
 |
 |
DETECTIVE JAKE'S PLACE |
 |
|
Anti death penalty |
|
Many people within law enforcement
do not agree with the use of the death penalty as a form of punishment for any
crime. I know the many arguments from people who support the death penalty, so
to answer any and all questions about each of those arguments, I'm posting
this link to the Death Penalty Information Center website ...
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/.
The site is full of good information and statistics. On this page, I'll give
you some of the main reasons for opposing the death penalty.
The main reason for opposing the death penalty is
because people make mistakes and that includes police officers, detectives,
lawyers, judges, and juries. Anyone can gather every bit of evidence, have it
processed, conduct witness interviews and suspect interrogations, and come to
the conclusion that the number one suspect can be the only person who could've
committed the crime. Everything points to that suspect and the D.A. (District
Attorney) agrees, so he assigns the case to a prosecutor. Because of the case
work, the prosecutor also thinks the person is guilty and presents all of the
evidence to the judge and jury. The jury deliberates, weighs the evidence, and
comes to the same conclusion ... the person is guilty beyond a reasonable
doubt. The suspect is now sentenced. Justice has been served. Or has it?
A lot of law enforcement officers aren't afraid
to admit they've arrested and the jury convicted people who have been
innocent. They may have been guilty of a lesser crime, but innocent of the
more serious charges. We only thank God many of them weren't sentenced to
death and that sentence carried out. There may be one or many people they've
arrested who're now sitting in prison who may later be cleared of all charges.
The law enforcement officials will continue to do their job the way they
always have and let the evidence lead them to their conclusions, hopefully the
right conclusions.
A lot of people say they support the death
penalty as a good crime deterrent, to cut down on the prison population, to
save tax-payer dollars, and because they feel it's the only way "true justice"
can be served. Most people will tell you they know a few innocent people may
die, but that's "just the chance we take to clean up this country". Well, it's
not a chance some people want to take. If even one innocent person dies from
any form of the death penalty, that's one too many.
So how do law enforcement officers mesh their
opposition with their job? What if they're involved with a case which ends up
being a capital offense? While in some states they work do have the death
penalty, for example in Pennsylvania, there have been only three executions
carried out since 1976. Right now, the police who are against the death
penalty have to be satisfied that chances are low anyone convicted of a
capital offense will ever face execution. While they continue to perform their
job, they can work with groups opposed to the death penalty and vote for
government officials who share their views and may one day do away with the
death penalty. |
|
|